Overview
Focusing on the population group and condition you identified in your Week 3 assignment, you will utilize an anti-oppressive framework to assess community and organizational conditions. This assessment will inform developing interventions and strategies in the Week 9 assignment.
By successfully completing this assignment, you demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAS and generalist behaviors:
- EPAS Competency 4: Engage in practice-informed research and research-informed practice.
- C4.GP.A: Apply research findings to inform and improve practice, policy, and programs.
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- Summarize the professional and academic research related to the population and condition.
- Describe at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified.
- Describe what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants.
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- C4.GP.B: Identify ethical, culturally informed, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive strategies that address inherent biases for use in quantitative and qualitative research methods to advance the purposes of social work.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- Reflect on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact your ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- C4.GP.A: Apply research findings to inform and improve practice, policy, and programs.
- EPAS Competency 5: Engage in policy practice.
- C5.GP.A: Use social justice, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive lenses to assess how social welfare policies affect the delivery of and access to social services
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- Summarize, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation.
- Develop a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population.
- Explain three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change, including the order of priority and your rationale for this order.
- Related Assignment Criteria:
- C5.GP.B: Apply critical thinking to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance human rights and social, racial, economic, and environmental justice.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- Explain frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- C5.GP.A: Use social justice, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive lenses to assess how social welfare policies affect the delivery of and access to social services
- EPAS Competency 6: Engage with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
- C6.GP.A: Apply knowledge of human behavior and person-in-environment, as well as interprofessional conceptual frameworks, to engage with clients and constituencies.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- Identify the specific strategies you used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Include your rationale for selecting these strategies.
- Related Assignment Criterion:
- C6.GP.A: Apply knowledge of human behavior and person-in-environment, as well as interprofessional conceptual frameworks, to engage with clients and constituencies.
Preparation
In this assignment, you will develop an audio/visual presentation in which you assess community and organizational conditions related to the population group and condition you identified in the Week 3 assignment. To prepare for developing your presentation, you must complete the three identified tasks.
- Task 1: Gather Information.
- Gather information from persons within the community or organization. Engage with at least five organizational and community members who (1) have direct lived experience as members of the population group, (2) are impacted by the identified condition, and (3) have (or have had) interactions with the organization or community. Find out how they view the situation, their thoughts about the condition, and any historical and contextual information they may have about the situation/condition. In your presentation, you will be asked to develop a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population (Netting et al., 2023, p. 302).
- Task 2: Explore Professional Knowledge Base.
- Locate peer-reviewed articles and explore frameworks, theories, and perspectives that will be useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem. You will need a minimum of 12 sources to support your presentation. From the literature, you will choose at least one practice approach to further discuss.
- Task 3: Identify Conditions That Need to Change.
- Compare what you find in the literature to what you found when engaging with the community members. What causal factors can you identify?
- Task 4: Consider Your Own Bias.
- Take time to consider your own position and reflect on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition. How might this bias impact your ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event?
Technology and Accessibility Considerations
Capella offers access to the recording software Kaltura and Microsoft PowerPoint. Any images must include alt-text that is relevant to the context, and all narration must include transcript. For more resources and support, refer to Audio and Video in this Course and PowerPoint in the Tools and Resources section of the courseroom. In addition, see the following:
Instructions
In your presentation, begin with an introduction in which you offer an overview of your topic and provide a concise description of the population group and condition you analyzed in the Week 3 assignment. Then, address the following:
- Summarize, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation.
- Identify the specific strategies you used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Include your rationale for selecting these strategies.
- Develop a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population.
- Summarize the professional and academic research related to the population and condition.
- Explain frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale.
- Describe at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified.
- Describe what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants.
- Explain three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change, including the order of priority and your rationale for this order.
- Reflect on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact your ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event.
Additional Requirements
Your presentation should meet the following requirements:
- Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
- Accessibility: Any images must include alt-text that is relevant to the context. All narration must include transcript.
- References: A minimum of 12 professional and academic resources. All literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.
- APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. See the Evidence and APALinks to an external site. section of the Writing Center for guidance.
- Slide requirements: 10–15 slides with simple, clear formatting, including:
- Introduction.
- Content pages.
- Summary.
- Reference pages.
Reference
Netting, F. E., Kettner, P. M., McMurtry, S. L., & Thomas, M. L. (2023). Social work macro practice (7th ed.). Pearson.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
- Competency 1: Apply research findings to inform and improve practice, policy, and programs. (C4.GP.A)
- Summarize the professional and academic research related to the population and condition. (C4.GP.A)
- Describe at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified. (C4.GP.A)
- Describe what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants. (C4.GP.A)
- Competency 2: Identify ethical, culturally informed, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive strategies that address inherent biases for use in quantitative and qualitative research methods to advance the purposes of social work. (C4.GP.B)
- Reflect on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact the ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event. (C4.GP.B)
- Competency 3: Use social justice, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive lenses to assess how social welfare policies affect the delivery of and access to social services. (C5.GP.A)
- Summarize, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation. (C5.GP.A)
- Develop a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population. (C5.GP.A)
- Explain three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change, including the order of priority and your rationale for this order. (C5.GP.A)
- Competency 4: Apply critical thinking to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies that advance human rights and social, racial, economic, and environmental justice. (C5.GP.B)
- Explain frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale. (C5.GP.B)
- Competency 5: Apply knowledge of human behavior and person-in-environment, as well as interprofessional conceptual frameworks, to engage with clients and constituencies. (C6.GP.A)
- Identify the specific strategies you used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Include your rationale for selecting these strategies. (C6.GP.A)
- Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
- Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.
View RubricCommunity and Organizational Assessment PresentationCommunity and Organizational Assessment PresentationCriteriaRatingsPtsSummarize, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation. (C5.GP.A)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDSummarizes, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation. Provides strong supporting details and examples.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTSummarizes, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially summarizes, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not summarize, without disclosing participant identities, what you found out about the condition, their views about the organization or community, and any relevant historical and contextual information related to the condition and situation./ 20 ptsIdentify the specific strategies you used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Include your rationale for selecting these strategies. (C6.GP.A)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDIdentifies the specific strategies you used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Strongly supports your rationale for selecting these strategies with literature.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTIdentifies the specific strategies you used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Includes your rationale for selecting these strategies.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially identifies you specific strategies used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Include your rationale for selecting these strategies.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not identify you specific strategies used to gather information from members of the organization or community. Does not include your rationale for selecting these strategies./ 20 ptsDevelop a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population. (C5.GP.A) 20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDevelops a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population. Statement is clear and well-supported.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTDevelops a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially develops a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not develop a condition statement that includes (1) a focal population, (2) a boundary, and (3) the difficulty facing the population./ 20 ptsSummarize the professional and academic research related to the population and condition. (C4.GP.A)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDSummarizes the professional and academic research related to the population and condition. Summary is clear and the literature chosen is relevant to the population and problem.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTSummarizes the professional and academic research related to the population and condition.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially summarizes the professional and academic research related to the population and condition.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not summarize the professional and academic research related to the population and condition./ 20 ptsExplain frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale. (C5.GP.B)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDExplains frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale. Claims and rationale are strongly supported with literature.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTExplains frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially explains frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not explain frameworks, theories, and/or perspectives that are most useful for understanding the condition, opportunity, need, or problem, including your rationale./ 20 ptsDescribe at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified. (C4.GP.A)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribe at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified. The choice is strongly supporting with literature and theoretical framework.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially describes at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe at least one promising practice approach, identified from the professional knowledge base, related to the condition you identified./ 20 ptsDescribe what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants. (C4.GP.A)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDDescribes what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants. Literature chosen directly supports the assertions.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTDescribes what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially describes what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not describe what factors may cause the condition, using information found in the professional and academic knowledge base and lived experiences of participants./ 20 ptsExplain three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change, including the order of priority and your rationale for this order. (C5.GP.A)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDExplains three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change. The order of priority and your rationale are clear and supported.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTExplains three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change, including the order of priority and your rationale for this order.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially explains three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change, including the order of priority and your rationale for this order.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not explain three causal factors that the focal organization or community members identify as needing to change, including the order of priority and your rationale for this order./ 20 ptsReflect on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact the ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event. (C4.GP.B)20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDReflects on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact the ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event. Provides examples and explanation that clarify the claims.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTReflects on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact the ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICPartially reflects on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact the ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not reflect on at least one implicit and one explicit bias you hold regarding the population and condition and how this bias may impact the ability to effectively collaborate in a successful macro-level change event./ 20 ptsCommunicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.20 to >13.4 ptsDISTINGUISHEDCommunicates with exceptional clarity in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.13.4 to >6.6 ptsPROFICIENTCommunicates in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.6.6 to >0 ptsBASICCommunicates in a manner that is professional and consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession.0 ptsNON_PERFORMANCEDoes not communicate in a manner that is consistent with expectations for members of the social work profession./ 20 p
2
Engaging and Addressing the Needs of Homeless Veterans in Urban Areas
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name
Instructor’s Name
Engaging and Addressing the Needs of Homeless Veterans in Urban Areas
Task 1: Start Where the Population Is
The selected population is Homeless Veterans in Urban Areas
Socioeconomic, Cultural, or Environmental Condition and its Impact on the Population
The target population for this study is homeless veterans in urban communities. This group is constantly influenced by social, economic, cultural, and environmental factors (Chinchilla et al., 2020). Due to this, veterans find it hard to reintegrate into society and become isolated, resulting in low support. Some veterans are potentially in danger of becoming unemployed/underemployed because they are physically or mentally disabled to work. Homeless veterans or those who experience mental illness will not receive the attention or necessary care due to their veteran status. Urban settings have higher costs of living, fewer available affordable housing units, and higher incidences of crime and substance abuse, which might destabilize this group. Such factors make it challenging to assist homeless veterans in recovering their new status in society.
Encounter with This Population Group
By interacting with veterans in large fields, I have learned the different forms and the need for them. Based on the observations in shelters and other outreach programs, I have learned about the impact of PTSD, substance use disorders, and challenges in obtaining benefits for veterans. These events have shown the spirit of the veterans and the barriers within the system that are present today. I have also observed how specific services like vocational, counseling, and services can enrich presence. These exchanges have shown that measures of one-on-one, compassionate approaches in addressing homeless veterans’ concerns are effective.
Self-Identities, Attitudes, and Biases
Being a social worker, I find it crucial to embrace the values of empathy, advocacy, and maintaining a commitment to social justice. Social class and culture affect people’s behaviors and how they expect others to behave. I also realize that I might possess certain stereotypes about homeless and mentally ill veterans when providing care. I need to recognize these prejudices to attempt to consciously think about veterans to ensure that I offer them polite, culturally sensitive, non-oppressive care. To support my clients, I aim for cultural competency, humility, and willingness to learn from more experienced peers.
Strengths, Weaknesses, And Power Imbalances
The homeless veterans are strong-willed individuals who can easily adapt to change and have many combat stories to tell. These attributes can assist them in their reintegration process into society. However, they are prone to developing PTSD, depression, chronic diseases, and substance use disorders (Lucas et al., 2021). These issues are compounded by social isolation, homelessness, and limited access to health care and veterans' services. Lack of resources in post-military transition, mental healthcare, and poverty all paint the picture of power imbalances that create homelessness. They may also fail in the capacity to ask for assistance and advocate for themselves because of the social isolation and discrimination that homeless veterans endure. These power dynamics should be addressed through promoting policies, increasing resources, and creating a welcoming campus.
Demonstrating Cultural Humility by Seeking the Population's Perspectives
Key Informants
Veterans Service Organization Leaders: Veterans organizations such as the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) can inform on homeless vets' systemic issues. They are reliable informants because they have advocated for veterans' rights and provided direct services.
Homeless Veterans: Engaging directly with homeless veterans themselves is crucial. They can provide a personal perspective by sharing their struggles and wants. This direct insight is essential in understanding this population's challenges and capabilities.
Including Diverse Voices and Perspectives
I will use a participative method that entails direct involvement with homeless veterans to include varied voices and viewpoints in clearly stating their difficulties. Focus groups and individual interviews with homeless veterans of diverse ages, genders, and ethnicities will ensure representation. Collaboration with veterans' service organizations will increase audience reach and institutional insights. I will also involve healthcare providers working closely with this group to address their issues holistically. Triangulation of these varied sources of information helps explain homeless veterans' challenges clearly and thoroughly, ensuring that their voices drive the development of practical and culturally relevant initiatives.
Task 2: Assess the Impacts of Difference, Discrimination, and Oppression
Stereotypes or Generalizations That Confront This Population Group
There are several stereotypes and generalizations that homeless veterans would have to endure. Such stereotypes include the belief that they are homeless due to their inability to manage their alcohol and drug addictions. Another stereotype is that homeless veterans are lazy or have no desire to get employment and reintegrate into society. These misconceptions fail to address the processes through which veterans become homeless, such as untreated mental health issues like PTSD, financial problems, and lack of resources. These beliefs promote homelessness discrimination and may exclude homeless veterans.
Discrimination and Oppression of This Population
The homeless veterans are discriminated and oppressed in every aspect or spot of life. The homeless are socially excluded, some people consider them as dangerous and unreliable – social and community exclusion (Chinchilla et al., 2020). Employed homeless veterans experience employment discrimination as a result of housing loss or mental health issues. Veterans are also affected by structural challenges within large hierarchical entities such as the Department of Veteran Affairs. Some of the homeless veterans are locked out of benefits and services as they must undergo through a long, cumbersome, and ineffective process. Such systematic oppression renders people helpless and hinders their social development.
Value Systems and Institutional Policies
There are several political beliefs and organizational structures that have posed negative impacts on the homeless veterans. The belief that homelessness is the fault of certain individuals and not socio-political structures fosters apathy and indifference. This impression translates to policy and funding which leads to a scarcity of housing, mental health, and job training. Such institutional practices as discharge from military have sustained the same. It demoralizes the veterans as those who are discharged dishonorably cannot get VA housing or health care. The bureaucracy of the VA and other supporting institutions hinders homeless veterans from accessing care easily.
Whether or Not Members of the Population Group Feel Isolated
Homeless veterans are made to feel like outcasts. Marginalization results from exclusion from the social, economic and political realms. Homeless veterans report feelings of loneliness and anger based on interviews and focus groups. Lack of public support means that many veterans have no access to social services or governmental aid. They feel that prejudice and discrimination in their daily lives are oppressive because of homelessness. They also described feelings of isolation and depression when talking about shelter and outreach experiences. These problems limit their prospects for timely and utilitarian assistance and ensure that they remain stigmatized: nearly all of the veterans remain impoverished and are unable to reintegrate. This exclusion is firsthand and accurate, and it also symbolizes the failure of the world and systems.
Assessing Intersectionality's Impact on Homeless Veterans: Assessing Intersectionality's Impact on Homeless Veterans
Intersectionality Dimensions
Homeless veterans are also unique in their multiple dimensions and personal attributes, including ethnicity, gender, mental health, and financial background. For example, African American and Hispanic veterans are disproportionately represented among homeless veterans since minority populations are also discriminated against in society. Female veterans, particularly those veterans who have been exposed to military sexual trauma (MST), have extra challenges when they end up homeless (Galovski et al., 2022). Homeless veterans also experience mental health challenges such as PTSD, which make their socioeconomic challenges worse.
Power, Privilege, Discrimination, And Oppression Issues of The Population
The situation of homeless veterans reveals power and privilege issues that exist regarding them. They tend to be helpless in a system that should assist them, for instance, the VA, which is cumbersome and unresponsive. Social prejudices specific to the homeless population and employment discrimination against veterans and homeless people are often encountered. Intersectional prejudice is compounded by institutional oppression, including a lack of adequate support services and restricted benefits. Female and minority veterans experience compounded discrimination based on their race and gender, leaving them as second-class citizens in the veteran and homeless populations.
Frameworks Are Useful in Understanding Population Dynamics
Models including the social determinants of health (SDOH) and critical race theory (CRT) can effectively decipher the factors involved with homeless veterans. SDOH demonstrates how economic stability, education, social and community context, health, and built environment influence health and well-being. CRT looks at how the issues of institutional racism and past injustices impact people of color veterans in areas like housing or care (Long, 2021). The Ecological Systems Theory breaks down myriad systems that influence homeless veterans, from personal to societal levels. These frameworks describe how social, economic, and institutional factors influence homeless veterans.
Task 3: Search Professional Knowledge Base
Nichter et al. (2022)
The present research applies the social determinants of health approach to explore homelessness among U. S. veterans. Using a nationally representative survey, the researchers identified that lifetime homelessness was 10.2 percent with unfavorable childhood experience, trauma, and low income as some of the leading predictors. The findings indicate that childhood experiences influence future homelessness and that veterans have poorer mental health and higher suicide risk. These data demonstrate how early life factors, military service, and veteran status are interconnected.
Betancourtt et al. (2023)
This qualitative study examines homeless veterans with substance use disorders using phenomenology and the Social-Ecological Model. The study shows how mental and physical wartime trauma can lead to substance use and homelessness in veterans. The study also shows how community influences perpetuate substance use and the propensity to relapse after family deaths, highlighting veterans' complicated, multi-layered experiences with homelessness and addiction.
Lucas et al. (2021)
A cumulative risk model is used to analyze veterans' mental and physical health after homelessness and military sexual assault (MSA). The study observed that homelessness and MSA considerably worsen PTSD, depression, and physical health concerns. These findings highlight the long-term developmental effects of trauma on health outcomes throughout adulthood and the need for trauma-informed care and therapies that address housing instability and sexual trauma in veterans.
Montgomery (2021)
Using a systems theory approach, this study synthesizes findings from universal screening for housing instability among veteran outpatients. The author highlights the complicated relationship between personal and societal variables affecting veterans' housing insecurity. The research shows that veterans' housing stability is dynamic and requires continuing support.
Flike & Byrne (2023)
This systematic study examines homeless women veterans' healthcare and social services using an access-to-care paradigm. The study examines service access hurdles and facilitators to highlight women veterans' distinct healthcare and social requirements throughout their lives. The research highlights how gender-specific variables, veteran status, and homelessness generate unique care access issues, emphasizing the need for specialized interventions and policies to address these complexes, developing needs.
Tsai & Kelton (2022)
Applying a health services utilization model, this study examines service use and barriers to care among homeless veterans. The researchers found significant racial/ethnic disparities in treatment utilization and similar obstacles, including stigma and lack of information. These findings demonstrate the need for culturally competent support services throughout veterans' homelessness experiences and how demographics and social stigma can affect service involvement throughout life.
Novacek et al. (2022
Community integration framework and critical race theory compare Black and White homeless veterans. Race, veteran status, and homelessness affect community reintegration, as shown by social integration and employment productivity differences. These findings show that veterans can still struggle to integrate into communities after homelessness, especially ethnic minorities who may face additional structural barriers.
Tsai et al. (2021)
Employing an intersectionality framework, this study analyzes the unmet needs of homeless veterans by gender and race/ethnicity. According to the study, housing, healthcare, and other unmet needs varied significantly across demographic groups. The multiple and changing needs of veterans during their homelessness demonstrate the ways in which multiple and changing identities are involved in services required and services offered throughout the life course. The study therefore underscores the need for culturally sensitive approach to homelessness prevention among diverse veteran population.
Impact of Social Relationships and Structures
Structural and Environmental Forces Affecting Homeless Veterans in Urban Areas
Homeless veterans in an urban environment encounter several structural and environmental factors that transform their lives in several ways. Gentrification and the soaring real estate prices mean that there is no affordable housing in many cities today. Such a scarcity causes low-income veterans to lose their stable residences and renders permanent housing unattainable for homeless veterans. Furthermore, the organizational structure is heavily bureaucratic and hierarchical at times that hinders the delivery of services. This system presents itself as a challenge to many veterans, especially those with mental health or substance use disorders. Density also leads to high living cost, high incidences of violence and crime, higher competition for resources such as shelter and health. Furthermore, the stigma associated with homelessness and mental illnesses has a negative impact on accumulation of social isolation and discrimination in reintegration of the veterans.
Theoretical Models of Interactions
The Social Ecological Model and Life Course Perspective provide an understanding of homeless veterans’ social processes. According to the Social Ecological Model, personal, interpersonal, community, and societal factors affect the behavior of a person (Caperon et al. , 2022). This paradigm demonstrates how individual characteristics, social contacts, available resources, and culture impact homeless veterans. On the other hand, the Life Course Perspective focuses more on how early events affect subsequent outcomes, particularly during sensitive stages of development. As applied to veterans, this framework can be helpful in elucidating the ways in which military service, particularly when it occurs during young adulthood, impacts mental health, social connectedness, and economic well-being in later life. These frameworks elucidate the complex nature of the interactions between homeless veterans and the city spaces they inhabit, and the necessity for integrative and holistic approaches to the issue.
Task 4: Develop Strategies for Authentic Engagement
Identifying Involved Stakeholders
Several stakeholders must be involved in recognizing the need for change regarding shelter provisions for homeless veterans within metropolitan areas to understand and implement solutions effectively. This group includes the veterans themselves because their experience and needs are paramount. Furthermore, Veteran service organizations like the VHA and local veteran non-profits help identify service gaps and initiatives. For sustainable reforms, stakeholders, including the community, leaders, lawmakers, and urban planners, need to embrace it. Lastly, awareness of interrelated physical and mental health care of homeless veterans by healthcare and mental health professionals who directly work with them contributes to the development of interventions.
Policies for Facilitating Purposeful Engagement
Inclusivity and transparency are two principles that can always be applied when dealing with the process. Inclusivity ensures that all parties of concern, including homeless veterans, have a say in the deliberation process. Ideas arising from different cognitive perspectives are helpful in producing rich and practical concepts. On the other hand, transparency involves the sharing of about engagement goals, activities, and outcomes. This fosters confidence and knowledge on how decisions are made and how various contributions are incorporated. Such principles create an atmosphere that allows stakeholders to participate actively in change processes.
Strategies for working with a diverse population
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) and culturally tailored focus groups can successfully recruit diverse groups (Singer et al., 2022). CBPR engages community members in every research step so that their input guides the formulation of questions, methods, and strategies. This strategy creates confidence and guarantees work that is to the benefit of the community. In contrast, culturally responsive focus groups create environments where diverse groups can share their ideas without prejudice. These focus groups should be conducted by people who are culturally sensitive enough to understand the various challenges faced by this population.
Allies, Advocates, and Accomplices
Four particular contacts and supporters for homeless veterans in metropolitan are the American Legion, the National Coalition for homeless veterans (NCHV), local agencies that offer housing, and religious bodies. The American Legion leverages its large membership base to lobby and assist veterans (Burtin, 2020). NCHV facilitates, supports and offers services to assist ending veteran homelessness across the country. Local housing authorities assist veterans in identifying their housing needs and implementing housing-first strategies. They help homeless veterans both short term and long term through their resources and volunteers. These supporters work together to advocate for policy change on behalf of homeless veterans and provide direct services to them.
References
Betancourt, C. A., Goldberg, D. G., Hawks, B. A., & Kitsantas, P. (2023). Perspectives of homeless veterans living with substance use disorders (SUD) and mental illness. Heliyon, 9(10), e20364–e20364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20364
Burtin, O. (2020). Veterans as a Social Movement: The American Legion, the First Hoover Commission, and the Making of the American Welfare State. Social Science History, 44(2), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2020.5
Caperon, L., Saville, F., & Ahern, S. (2022). Developing a socio-ecological model for community engagement in a health programme in an underserved urban area. PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0275092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275092
Chinchilla, M., Gabrielian, S., Glasmeier, A., & Green, M. F. (2020). Exploring Community Integration Among Formerly Homeless Veterans in Project-Based Versus Tenant-Based Supportive Housing. Community Mental Health Journal, 56(2), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-019-00473-x
Flike, K., & Byrne, T. (2023). Systematic review of access to healthcare and social services among US women Veterans experiencing homelessness. Women’s Health (London, England), 19, 17455057231189550. https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057231189550
Galovski, T. E., Street, A. E., Creech, S., Lehavot, K., Kelly, U. A., & Yano, E. M. (2022). State of the Knowledge of VA Military Sexual Trauma Research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(S3), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07580-8
Long, L. J. (2021). The Ideal victim: a Critical Race Theory (CRT) Approach. International Review of Victimology, 27(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758021993339
Lucas, C. L., Harris, T., Stevelink, S. A. M., McNamara, K. A., Rafferty, L., Kwan, J., Dunn, R., Fear, N. T., Kintzle, S., & Castro, C. A. (2021). Homelessness among Veterans: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, Physical Health, and the Cumulative Trauma of Military Sexual Assault. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1086/712991
Montgomery, A. E. (2021). Understanding the Dynamics of Homelessness among Veterans Receiving Outpatient Care: Lessons Learned from Universal Screening. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 693(1), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716221995161
Nichter, B., Tsai, J., & Pietrzak, R. H. (2022). Prevalence, correlates, and mental health burden associated with homelessness in U.S. military veterans. Psychological Medicine, 53(9), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291722000617
Novacek, D. M., Wynn, J. K., Gabrielian, S., Glynn, S. M., Hellemann, G., Horan, W. P., Kern, R. S., Lee, J., Marder, S. R., Sugar, C., & Green, M. F. (2022). Examining racial differences in community integration between black and white homeless veterans. Psychiatry Research, 308, 114385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114385
Singer, R., Crooks, N., Abboud, S., & Patil, C. L. (2022). Engaging Vulnerable Populations in Community-based Participatory Research: Lessons Learned. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 16(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2022.0026
Tsai, J., & Kelton, K. (2022). Service use and barriers to care among homeless veterans: Results from the National Veteran Homeless and Other Poverty Experiences (NV‐HOPE) study. Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22912
Tsai, J., Mitchell, L., Nakashima, J., & Blue-Howells, J. (2021). Unmet needs of homeless U.S. veterans by gender and race/ethnicity: Data from five annual surveys. Psychological Services. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000557
